LPMA Louisiana Psychiatric Medical Association

SPRING/SUMMER
2000

Volume. 35
Number 1

Previous ArticleNext Article
PREVIOUS / NEXT
ARTICLE


Return to Newsletter Index Page
Index


Insurance Committee Report
Dean E. Robinson, M.D., Chair
The health care insurance industry continues to move towards managed care despite growing public resentment, increasing losses in the courtroom and declining profitability. Consolidation and mergers have reduced the number of players, leaving the field dominated by 10 or 11 companies that control 85% of the market. These entities have the financial resources to significantly impede reform measures at the national level, so no significant federal legislation is likely until after the next election cycle.

Reports of abusive practices by managed care organizations (MCO) continue to accumulate
  • Retroactive denials
  • Unjustified delays in payments of even undisputed claims
  • Limiting access and utilization by allowing provider networks to deteriorate
  • Excessive, intrusive and unreasonable documentation and review requirements
  • Closed formularies, slow adoption of innovations requiring higher initial costs, etc.
MCOs argue that these reports are exaggerated, or are the unintended growing pains of a repidly expanding industry and will decrease in significance as the industry matures. However, this is of no comfort to those of us who have lived under fire in the trenches of front line treatment for the last few years. A real sense of combat fatigue among clinicians should not blind us to signs that the battle may already be turning.

Encouraging reports are now coming in mostly from the state, local and even theoffice levels. State legislators have introduced and enacted hundreds of patient protection measures, and Louisiana (like several other states) has enacted parity legislation for selected mental illnesses. Louisiana also now requires that MCO medical reviweers have a current Louisiana license. And state and federal district courts in many jusristictions have seriously dented or demolished the ERISA shield that had so thwarted efforts to regulate MCOs or hold them accountable for bad behavior.

Thus it makes mroe sense now than ever for us to virorously fight back. The individual practitioner can effectivel advocate for patients by:
  • Insisting that reviews for medical necessity be performed only by Lousiana licensed psychiatrists. You may also request the name of the reviewer, and that information should be passed on to the LPMA. Remind companies that their refusal to comply could result in referral to state authorities for criminal prosecution under the Louisiana Medical Practice Act.
 
  • Appeal, appeal, appeal! Create a paper trail that demonstrates your attempt to resolve the dispute internally. Use corroboration from clinical colleagues or existing Utilization Review Committees to supprot your position. Most of the time the offending MCO will eventually decide you are too much trouble and will honor the claim.
  • Refuse to play ball at all with the bad players. MCOs seeking certain types of accreditation have to maintain a level of provider staffing to meet these standards. Chances are that if they've been obnoxious to you, they've been obnoxious to others, and as their provider ranks dwindle you may have more clout than you think.
  • Report bad MCO behavior directly to the employer. Often the individuals who make the decisions about contracting for insurance also depend on the offending MCO for their own care and that of their families.
  • Inform your patients that they can report bad MCO behavior to the Louisiana Insurance Commission. Inform them that they can complain to the State Board of Medical Examiners about physician reviewers licensed inLouisiana who make unjustified denials on the basis of inadequate information.
  • Inform your patients that there are lawyers out there who are interested in representing those who have been defrauded by insurance companies acting in bad faith. Pass on the names of reputable attorneys involved in such cases to the LPMA so that we can pass them on to others.
  • Ask if the offending MCO is accredited by the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA). Thi sorganization has emerged as the most widely accepted accreditation agency for MCOs. Familarize yourself with the NCQA standards (www.ncqa.org) and tell them you will report them for violations.


Collectively we can advocate for our patients by:

  • Continuing our support for legislation at the state level to see that those responsible for bad decisions are actually held accountable for those decisions.
  • Disseminate information about abusive MCO practices to consumer advocacy groups and the press.
  • Advocate within our professional organizations for an aggressive public relations counter-offensive to the misinformation spread by MCO industry lobbying groups
  • Join our efforts with other groups to initiate legal class action or corrupt practices lawsuits against companies that systematically mislead or defraud their customers.


The war we are waging does not turn on a single battle, and the latest signs definitely point to victories to come, provided that we continue to resist, make good use of our allies and do our part for those who turn to us for help.


RETURN TO NEWSLETTER INDEX PAGE

Copyright © LPMA 2000